Aug

Poor Obama Saddleback Performance

by Christian on August 17th, 2008

Not sure if anyone else caught the Saddleback Church debate, but I was truly in awe at Obama’s terrible performance. People like to paint him as this charismatic young fresh face, but last night’s debate I think proved just the opposite.

First thing I happened to notice was his demeanor. He seemed very uncomfortable and seemed as though he was unable to look directly into the camera or for that matter at the audience. In doing that, he gives the impression as though he was very insincere and wasn’t really being honest with us. Let alone his relentless use of uhh and umm, which made him excruciatingly painful to watch.

The second thing I noticed was his ability to dodge questions and the moderator to just let it slide. For that I am disappointed in Rick Warren. Obama’s lack of actually answering the question is one thing, but Pastor Warren’s allowing him to do so is another. This is his most notable dodge, of which is to a question that is extremely important to many Evangelicals.

Q. Now, let’s deal with abortion. 40 million abortions since Roe v. Wade. You know, as a pastor I have to deal with this all the all of the time. All of the pain and all of the conflicts. I know this is a very complex issue. 40 million abortions. At one point does a baby get human rights in your view?

A. Well, I think that whether you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade. But let me just speak more generally about the issue of abortion because this is something obviously the country wrestles with. One thing that I’m absolutely convinced of is there is a moral and ethical content to this issue. So I think that anybody who tries to deny the moral difficulties and gravity of the abortion issue I think is not paying attention. So that would be point number one.

But point number two, I am pro-choice. I believe in Roe v. Wade and come to that conclusion not because I’m pro abortion, but because ultimately I don’t think women make these decisions casually. They wrestle with these things in profound ways, in consultation with their pastors or spouses or their doctors and their family members.

And so for me, the goal right now should be — and this is where I think we can find common ground and by the way I have now inserted this into the democrat party platform is how do we reduce the number of abortions because the fact is that although we’ve had a president who is opposed to abortions over the last eight years, abortions have not gone down.

So wait a minute, Obama. You are a United States Senator, who’s job is to legislate, who also happens to running for the leader of the free world, yet you can’t make up your mind as to when a baby deserves to be given the same rights as those who are out of the womb? So then Obama, I submit this question to you, at what pay grade are you qualified to make such a determination? I mean $165,200 isn’t like it’s pocket change. Also not forgetting about a presidential salary of a wopping $400,000 should he win the presidency in November.

Obama can’t even honestly answer when he feels a baby is a person, how can we trust him to run our country? Yet another reason to reconsider voting for him.

Tags: Obama, Saddleback

Politics 2 Comments, read on »

Jun

13

Teacher Asks Students How Many Are Obama Fans

by Christian on June 13th, 2008

Saw this on a forum I frequent, got a huge chuckle out of it and just couldn’t resist sharing.

A teacher in Elmira, New York asked her 5th grade class how many of them were Obama fans.

Not really knowing what an Obama fan was, but wanting to be liked by the teacher, all the kids raised their hands. Except for Johnny.

The teacher asked, “Johnny, why did you decide to be different from the rest of the class?”

Johnny explained, “Because I’m not an Obama fan.”

The teacher asked, “Well, Johnny, why aren’t you an Obama fan?”

Johnny explained, “Because I’m a Republican.”

The teacher asked, “Why are you a Republican, Johnny?”

Johnny answered, “Well, my mom’s a Republican and my dad’s a Republican, so I’m a Republican.”

With a smirk that made the class giggle, the teacher asked, “Johnny, if your mom was a moron and your dad was an idiot, what would that make you?”

A huge smile broke out across Johnny’s face. “That,” he happily replied, “would make me an Obama fan!”

Life as Xian, Politics 5 Comments, read on »

Mar

14

More of Jeremiah Wright’s Outrageous Comments

by Christian on March 14th, 2008

This man just absolutely makes me sick to my stomach. What also gets me is how someone who is trying to become the next president of the United States could even consider going to a church who’s pastor peddles such hatred and blatant genuine hate his country and not to mention white people. Obama should be ashamed for even entertaining such a person.

Link: sevenload.com

Politics 1 Comment, join up »

Mar

6

California’s War on Homeschooling

by Christian on March 6th, 2008

Ruling seen as a threat to many home-schooling families

By Seema Mehta and Mitchell Landsberg, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers

Parents who lack teaching credentials cannot educate their children at home, according to a state appellate court ruling that is sending waves of fear through California’s home schooling families.

Advocates for the families vowed to appeal the decision to the state Supreme Court. Enforcement until then appears unlikely, but if the ruling stands, home-schooling supporters say California will have the most regressive law in the nation.

“This decision is a direct hit against every home schooler in California,” said Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute, which represents the Sunland Christian School, which specializes in religious home schooling. “If the state Supreme Court does not reverse this . . . there will be nothing to prevent home-school witch hunts from being implemented in every corner of the state of California.”

The institute estimates there are as many as 166,000 California students who are home schooled. State Department of Education officials say there is no way to know the true number.

Unlike at least 30 other states, home schooling is not specifically addressed in California law. Under the state education code, students must be enrolled in a public or private school, or can be taught at home by a credentialed tutor.

The California Department of Education currently allows home schooling as long as parents file paperwork with the state establishing themselves as small private schools, hire credentialed tutors or enroll their children in independent study programs run by charter or private schools or public school districts while still teaching at home.

California does little to enforce those provisions and insists it is the local school districts’ responsibility. In addition, state education officials say some parents home school their children without the knowledge of any entity.

Home schoolers and government officials have largely accepted this murky arrangement.

“This works so well, I don’t see any reason to change it,” said J. Michael Smith, president of the Virginia-based Home School Legal Defense Assn.

The appellate court ruling stems from a case involving Lynwood parents Phillip and Mary Long, who were repeatedly referred to the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services over various allegations, including claims of physical abuse, involving some of their eight children.

All of the children are currently or had been enrolled in Sunland Christian School, where they would occasionally take tests, but were educated in their home by their mother, Phillip Long said.

A lawyer appointed to represent two of the Long’s young children requested that the court require them to physically attend a public or private school where adults could monitor their well-being. A trial court disagreed, but the children’s lawyer appealed to the 2nd District Court of Appeal, which has jurisdiction over Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties.

The appellate panel ruled that Sunland officials’ occasional monitoring of the Longs’ home schooling — with the children taking some tests at the school — is insufficient to qualify as being enrolled in a private school. Since Mary Long does not have a teaching credential, the family is violating state laws, the ruling said.

“Parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,” wrote Justice H. Walter Croskey in a Feb. 28 opinion signed by the two other members of the district court. “Parents who fail to [comply with school enrollment laws] may be subject to a criminal complaint against them, found guilty of an infraction, and subject to imposition of fines or an order to complete a parent education and counseling program.”

Phillip Long said he believes the ruling stems from hostility against Christians and vowed to appeal to the state Supreme Court.

“I have sincerely held religious beliefs,” he said. “Public schools conflict with that. I have to go with what my conscience requires me.”

Public schools teach such topics as evolution, which Long said he doesn’t believe in. He said his wife spends six hours each day teaching their children reading, writing, math, science, health, physical education, Bible and social studies. Court papers say Mary Long’s education ended at 11th grade.

It’s unclear if the ruling will be enforced, given the likely appeals. Typically, these rulings take effect 30 days after they are issued.

Other organizations that plan to get involved include the Pacific Justice Institute, Home School Legal Defense Assn. and the Home School Assn. of California.

Meanwhile, state Department of Education’s attorneys are reviewing the ruling.

Teachers union officials will also be closely monitoring the appeal. A.J. Duffy, president of United Teachers Los Angeles, said he agrees with the ruling.

“What’s best for a child is to be taught by a credentialed teacher,” he said.

While many educators and officials remained unfamiliar with the ruling Tuesday, news about it has been sweeping websites and blogs devoted to home schooling. Organizations have been getting tense phone calls from parents worried that they will be targeted.

Families who home school includethose whose religious beliefs conflict with public schools and those whose children are in the entertainment industry or have other time-consuming activities that require them to study at an individualized pace.

Glenn and Kathleen, a Sacramento-area couple who requested that their last name not be used for fear of prosecution, home school their 9-year-old son Hunter because their Christian beliefs would be contradicted in a public school setting, Glenn said. He is troubled by the idea that his son would be exposed to teachings about evolution, homosexuality, same-sex marriage and sex education .

“I want to have control over what goes in my son’s head, not what’s put in there by people who might be on the far left who have their own ideas about indoctrinating kids,” he said.

If the ruling takes effect, Glenn vowed to move his family out of state. “If I can’t home school my son in California, we’re going to have to end up leaving California. That’s how important it is to me.”

“‘Parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,’ wrote Justice H. Walter Croskey in a Feb. 28 opinion signed by the two other members of the district court.” - I’m sorry, what? Barry F. made a very interesting point over at MM.com about how a woman’s right too choose is a constitutional right, but yet homeschooling your kids isn’t? Huh?? If that isn’t a double standard, I sure don’t know what is.

Politics No comments yet, be the first »

Feb

29